Araştırma Makalesi

1913 Tarihli İttihat ve Terakkî Fırkası Nizamnâmesi Bağlamında İttihat ve Terakkî’nin Cemiyet-Parti İkilemi Üzerine Bazı Değerlendirmeler

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 12 31 Aralık 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

Some Evaluations on Committee-Party Dilemma of the Union and Progress in the Context of Party of Progress and Union Regulations Dated 1913

Abstract

The regulations of the Committee of Union and Progress are important references in terms of Turkish political life and parliamentary tradition. Since the Committee played an active role in the proclamation of the constitutional monarchy, it saw itself as the father and guard of the constitutional monarchy. After the proclamation of the constitutional monarchy, it did not form a government, but preferred the power of control. The Committee gained a great advantage over its opponent, the Ahrar Party in 1908 elections. Continuing its activities as both the Union and the Committee of the Union and Progress has been criticized by its opponents, and the committee-party polemic has been formed. The Committee wanted to hinder the criticism of the committee-party of the opponents by including the name of the Party of Union and Progress other than the Committee of Union and Progress in the program it published in 1913 after the Bâbıâli (Sublime Porte) raid. After taking part in this regulation, the Committee of Union and Progress Regulations and the Union and Progress Chamber of Deputies Group Regulations were published on the same date. Discussing this regulation for the first time in this study makes the study important.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Ahmad, Feroz. İttihat ve Terakkî. Trc. Nuran Yavuz. Ankara: Kaynak Yayınları, 1984.
  2. Ahmet Muhtar. İntak-ı Hak. İstanbul: y.y., 1930.
  3. Akşin, Sina. Jön Türkler İttihat ve Terakkî. İstanbul: İmge Yayınları, 2001.
  4. Bayar, Celal. Bende Yazdım. 3 Cilt. İstanbul: Sabah Kitapları, 1997.
  5. Birinci, Ali. Hürriyet ve İtilaf Fırkası. İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 1990.
  6. Birinci, Ali. Tarih Yolunda. İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 2001.
  7. Danişmend, İsmail Hami. İzahlı Osmanlı Tarihi Kronolojisi. 6 Cilt. İstanbul: Türkiye Basımevi, 1955.
  8. Danişmend, İsmail Hami. 31 Mart Vakası. İstanbul: Fatih Yayınevi Matbaası, 1974.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Mayıs 2019

Kabul Tarihi

26 Kasım 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 12

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD
Aslan, Taner. “1913 Tarihli İttihat ve Terakkî Fırkası Nizamnâmesi Bağlamında İttihat ve Terakkî’nin Cemiyet-Parti İkilemi Üzerine Bazı Değerlendirmeler”. Mütefekkir 6/12 (01 Aralık 2019): 559-574. https://doi.org/10.30523/mutefekkir.659198.

Cited By